A business owner checking their Domain Authority score every week and panicking over a two-point drop is optimizing for a metric that doesn’t directly control their rankings at all. Domain Authority (DA) and Page Authority (PA) are metrics built by Moz, a third-party SEO tool company — not by Google — and treating them as a literal Google ranking factor is a common misunderstanding worth clearing up before investing heavily in moving them.
Our domain and page authority service works with these scores for what they actually are: a useful, standardized way to gauge relative site strength and track progress over time, built from many of the same underlying signals (link quality, site health) that do genuinely influence search rankings — just not the score itself.
This distinction matters because businesses sometimes chase DA improvement as if it were the goal itself, when it’s actually a proxy for underlying factors — backlink quality, site health, content authority — that genuinely do matter to search engines. Improving those underlying factors tends to move DA as a side effect. Chasing DA directly, through tactics like buying low-quality links purely to inflate the number, can move the score while doing nothing (or actively hurting) actual search performance.
Backlink quality and quantity from other authoritative sites is the largest factor, which connects directly to our backlinking services. Beyond links, overall site health, content quality and depth, and how long a domain has been established all factor into Moz’s model.
A brand-new site with excellent content and a handful of strong backlinks will still show a lower DA than an established site with a decade of accumulated link history, simply because domain age is baked into the calculation.
A site can have a solid overall Domain Authority while individual pages carry meaningfully different Page Authority scores — a homepage with years of accumulated links typically outranks a new service page added last month, even on the same domain. This matters when deciding where to point new backlinks: a new page benefits disproportionately from a few strong, direct links, while a well-established homepage often has less room for a single new link to move its already-high score.
DA and PA scores update periodically and can fluctuate slightly between updates without any real underlying change having happened — a small fluctuation isn’t a meaningful signal on its own. We track authority scores as part of a monthly reporting cycle, looking at the trend over several months rather than reacting to any single update, since short-term noise in these scores doesn’t reliably correlate with short-term ranking changes.
“ These guys made my site's authority shine with their expertise. It's easier for people to trust my content now! Their support is also very great. ”
“ Fast delivery, outstanding work quality that's what I got from WebSnarks. Their team's support and professionalism made the work go very smooth.”
“ Impressed with WebSnarks Domain and page authority service. It is take a little time but my DA is improving and PA is as well. Fully Trusted Team.”
“ I love the domain authority work done by WebSnarks. They delivered exactly what I wanted and the process was super easy. Highly recommended! ”
Authority doesn’t build in isolation from the rest of an SEO campaign. It’s most effectively pursued alongside off-page backlinking work, since backlinks are the primary driver, and technical SEO health, since a site with crawl errors and broken pages caps how effectively accumulated authority actually translates into rankings. We treat authority tracking as one signal within a broader campaign, not a standalone service pursued in isolation from everything else affecting a site’s performance.
A third-party metric from Moz, on a 1-100 scale, predicting how well a domain is likely to rank in search results based primarily on backlink quality and quantity. It’s not a direct Google ranking factor, but correlates with underlying signals that are.
Primarily through earning quality backlinks from authoritative, relevant sites, combined with strong overall site health and content quality — there’s no direct lever to pull on the score itself, since it’s a byproduct of these underlying factors.
No — it’s a Moz-created metric, not something Google uses directly. It correlates with factors (like backlink quality) that do influence rankings, which is why it’s still a useful benchmark despite not being an official ranking signal.